July 10, 2026, 8:52 am | Read time: 2 minutes
The dream of a relaxing trip to paradise turned into a disaster for a couple during the flight. Instead of beach and relaxation, they faced a hospital, pain, and a serious diagnosis. Now a court has ruled that the affected vacationer is entitled to both compensation and damages for pain and suffering.
Severe Injuries Already on the Outbound Flight
On the way to Mauritius, the plane encountered severe turbulence over the Indian Ocean. The future plaintiff was thrown from his seat and hit his head against the cabin ceiling, according to a statement from the Frankfurt am Main Regional Court.
After landing, the man was initially taken to a hospital and spent one night there before he could return to the hotel. However, there was no thought of relaxation. Due to severe pain, he spent most of the vacation in bed. Only after returning to Germany did doctors discover two broken cervical vertebrae. According to the court, there was a risk to his life. His wife also suffered a fractured thoracic vertebra.
When Airlines Must Pay Additional Costs for Delays
Lufthansa Strike! These 3 Passenger Rights You Should Know
Court Rules in Favor of the Plaintiff
The man sued the tour operator with whom the package holiday was booked. The Frankfurt am Main Regional Court (Case No.: 2-24 O 527/23) awarded him the full travel price of 5,800 euros as “compensation for wasted vacation time.”
According to the court, the trip had no recreational value for the couple due to the severe injuries.
The court did not recognize any contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. Although the man was not buckled at the time of the turbulence, the seatbelt signs were only activated after the plane had already dropped.
Additional Claim for Damages for Pain and Suffering
In addition to the reimbursement of the travel price, the vacationer is also entitled to damages for pain and suffering amounting to 20,000 euros, according to the court’s decision.
The legal basis for the claims is the Montreal Convention. This regulates “in particular the liability of airlines in the event of death, injury to passengers, or loss, damage, and delay of baggage.” According to the court, the defendant package tour operator is considered a contractual air carrier under the convention and is therefore liable for the injuries sustained. The judgment is not yet final.
With material from dpa